Imagine buying a game, enjoying it for a while, and then one day, it’s simply gone. Not just unplayable due to server shutdown, but removed from your digital library. This isn’t a hypothetical scare tactic; it’s exactly what happened with Ubisoft’s racing title, The Crew, igniting a massive consumer movement called “Stop Killing Games.” Shareholders are now pressing Ubisoft to address the growing outcry for permanent game access.
Contents
This controversy highlights a critical debate: Who truly owns digital games once purchased? And what responsibility do publishers have to ensure long-term playability?
The Spark: The Crew‘s Disappearance
The “Stop Killing Games” movement, spearheaded by YouTuber Ross Scott of Accursed Farms last April, was born from Ubisoft’s decision to shut down the servers for its always-online open-world racer, The Crew. This move, which happened in March, rendered the game completely unplayable, impacting both its multiplayer and single-player modes. The situation escalated when Ubisoft began revoking licenses, essentially deleting the game from owners’ libraries and crushing hopes for community-led private server revivals.
Ubisoft’s Stance: “Nothing Lasts Forever”
Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot recently addressed these concerns, stating that publishers operate in a “market” where “support for all games cannot last forever.” He highlighted Ubisoft’s existing practices, such as providing information on game longevity, “online connection required” warnings on boxed products, and terms of service that allow them to cancel access to online features with 30 days’ notice.
Guillemot also pointed to a past sale where The Crew 2 was offered for just $1/€1 to buyers of the original game, implying a form of compensation. He reiterated that the issue isn’t unique to Ubisoft, arguing that software with a service component can become “obsolete over time,” necessitating new versions.
A striking visual of a game character in a dynamic pose, from a video discussing the future of AAA games.
What Gamers Really Want: Playable End-of-Life
However, Guillemot’s defense misses the core demand of the “Stop Killing Games” initiative. It’s not about endless support or expecting companies to maintain servers indefinitely. The movement’s FAQ clearly states: “We are in favor of publishers ending support for a game whenever they choose.”
What they are asking for is an “end-of-life plan” – a patch or modification that allows the game to run on customer systems independently, without needing continuous company support. This approach has already been demonstrated by other publishers, with titles like Gran Turismo Sport and Knockout City serving as prime examples of responsible server shutdowns. They were transitioned to an offline or community-supported model, allowing players to retain access to their purchased content.
The Growing Momentum for Digital Rights
This consumer-driven initiative is gaining serious traction, having already surpassed 1 million signatures globally. Last week, Video Games Europe, an EU industry body representing major publishers like Ubisoft, Microsoft, and Nintendo, weighed in, claiming that the initiative’s proposals would make games “prohibitively expensive to create.” This perspective suggests a clash between consumer expectations for long-term access and the current financial models of game development.
Meanwhile, in the UK, the “Stop Killing Games” official UK petition has garnered over 150,000 signatures. This significant milestone means it must now be considered for debate in the UK parliament, despite an earlier government’s response indicating no immediate plans to tighten consumer law regarding game server shutdowns. This parliamentary consideration highlights the increasing political attention on digital ownership rights and consumer protection in the gaming industry.
The Future of Your Game Library
The ongoing debate between gamers and publishers over game preservation and digital ownership is far from over. As more games shift to “always-online” models or rely heavily on server infrastructure, ensuring purchased content remains playable in the long term becomes crucial. The “Stop Killing Games” movement isn’t just about The Crew; it’s a powerful call for greater accountability and transparency from publishers, shaping the future of how we interact with and truly “own” our digital entertainment. As this movement continues to grow, it puts immense pressure on the gaming industry to rethink its approach to digital game lifecycles.
